Notes:
Metro performance rankings are based on employment and income growth rates. For the 2007–2010 period, the year of slowest growth (or largest decline) was used.
For more information, see the Global Metro Monitor home page or send an email with your questions/comments to globalmetromonitor@brookings.edu.
Follow the conversation on Twitter: #GlobalMM.
Data sources: Oxford Economics, Moody's Analytics, and the US Census Bureau.
[CLOSE]
Select a
time period
ZOOM OUT >>
CLICK TO ZOOM >>
CLICK TO ZOOM >>
CLICK TO ZOOM >>
Population
(millions)
Metro performance (2010–2011)
Click on a Metro Area to View its Indicators on the Dashboard Below
View detailed profile (PDF) >>| 2010–2011 | Income | Emp. |
| - | ---% | ---% |
| 2007–2010 (min. year) | ||
| - | ---% | ---% |
| 1993–2007 | ||
| - | ---% | ---% |
Overall rankings
Combined performance on annual employment and income growth relative to other metropolitan areas
Income growth
Inflation-adjusted gross product per person. Captures economic growth while controlling for population
Employment growth
Number of employed persons. Reflects economic growth coming in the form of new jobs
Industrial structure
Gross product by industry. Shows which industries are the most important economic drivers
Rankings
Income (1993=100)
Employment (1993=100)
Industrial structure
Data not available